Loading... Please wait...
Contact Us
Would you like more
information on this report
Please contact us today at +44(0)20.7665.9240
or +1 212.220.0880
or write to us.

Physician Views: Biosimilar naming conventions – what do physicians think?

Product Code:
Date released:
February 11, 2014

What's in a name? A lot, according to biosimilar developers, who continue to advocate that biosimilar products should share an international non-proprietary name (INN) with the innovator brand that they are based on.

Biosimilar launches in Europe have typically followed this approach, but it is in the US where the debate is most heavily focused at present. Furthermore, the administration is expected to unveil guidance this year about its proposed guidance for 'interchangeability' - an opportunity for biosimilar developers where naming conventions look to be particularly important.

With identical – and not 'similar' – INN designation seen as a potential catalyst to boost uptake of biosimilars, it is no great surprise to see US payers fighting in the same corner as biosimilar developers.

Innovator companies, in contrast, suggest that such an initiative would put patient safety at risk and limit the ability to track treatment usage effectively. One suggestion – put forward by the pro-identical INN lobby – is that advances in analytical tools make such arguments redundant by providing sufficient assurance that minor manufacturing changes will have insignificant clinical effect. Furthermore, traditional generics use the same INN as the branded originator and usage tracking works effectively with this system, advocates add.

But what do physicians think? What do they consider to be the correct naming convention and how will this impact their potential usage of biosimilars.

Poll Questions

This week, FirstWord polled US and EU5-based oncologists and rheumatologists (the two physician types most likely to prescribe first-generation biosimilar antibody products) to gauge their view. Specifically we asked them:

  • What naming convention for biosimilar products they believe would offer the most suitable option?
  • What concerns they have/would have assuming a biosimilar shares an identical INN with the branded originator?
  • The impact of an identical INN on originator-to-biosimilar switching?
  • How important use of the INN is in their usage of biologic therapies?
  • Which labelling convention would most likely encourage their prescription of a biosimilar?

Note: FirstWord Polls are powered by MedePolls, a fast-turnaround service to conduct instant polls of up to five questions with guaranteed samples that include physicians from dozens of specialities and over 100 markets. To conduct this poll with a different audience, or an entirely different poll, contact us at info@firstwordpharma.com.


All Contents Copyright © 2021 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited All Rights Reserved